Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin
"Previously I was using *******. IQFeed is WAY more economical, and for my charting needs is just as good, if not better." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I'm very glad I switched to IQFeed. It's working perfectly with no lag, even during fast market conditions." - Comment from Andy via Email
"If you want customer service that answers the phone, your best bet is IQFeed. I cannot stop praising them or their technical support. They are always there for you, and they are quick. I have used ****** too but the best value is IQFeed." - Comment from Public Forum
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"As a past ******* customer(and not a happy one), IQ Feed by DTN is a much better and cheaper product with great customer support. I have had no problems at all since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum
"Awesome response, as usual. It is a sincere and refreshing pleasure to do business with DTN, compared to your competition." - Comment from Ryan
"Interactive Brokers tick data was inconsistent, so I have switched to using DTN exclusively. It is great to no longer have to worry about my datafeed all day long." - Comment from Philippe
"I cannot believe what a difference it makes trading with ProphetX!" - Comment from Bruce in Los Angeles
"IQFeed version 4 is a real screamer compared to anything else I have seen." - Comment from Tom
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »General Discussion »Trading Tips, Tricks and Ideas »Machine learning and tick-by-tick data
Author Topic: Machine learning and tick-by-tick data (2 messages, Page 1 of 1)

keohir808
-Interested User-
Posts: 6
Joined: Sep 16, 2019


Posted: Jan 30, 2022 08:45 PM          Msg. 1 of 2
There seems to be a lack of research regarding the use of tick-by-tick data as input to machine learning models. Has anyone experimented with machine learning and tick-by-tick data? I’ve trained an LSTM with about 2 years worth using tick-by-tick data with DTN which fit a certain criteria such as float, volume, price. The result is a model with around 69.9% accuracy. A naïve model which predicts that the bid price will be the same price as the last tick has an accuracy of around 65%. I’m wondering if I can increase my model’s accuracy through feature engineering. Could anyone share research papers regarding machine learning and tick-by-tick data? Does anyone have any insight regarding data transformations that can be applied to financial data which may result in increased accuracy if used as a feature in machine learning models?


Interests & Tools: Machine Learning, Neural Networks, Deep Learning, Python, Java, Trading, Small Caps, Interactive Brokers.
Edited by keohir808 on Jan 30, 2022 at 08:50 PM

taa_dtn
-DTN Evangelist-
Posts: 141
Joined: May 7, 2004


Posted: Jan 31, 2022 11:10 AM          Msg. 2 of 2
Yes, I experimented with this a few years ago. Your questions are relevant and insightful, but I don't have much useful information to offer in reply.

I haven't seen many published papers on the subject in recent years. Take that with a grain of salt, though, because I'm not looking actively enough. Possibly if the technique has been applied successfully, it hasn't been discussed in public for the obvious reasons. Hopefully someone else will reply with better information.

In general, I hit the same roadblocks you did. It's hard to choose the right network architecture (financial data isn't statistically stationary, so I wasn't able to design either recurrent or convolutional networks that were consistently successful). Raw tick-by-tick data has so much variability along so many dimensions that I suspect feature engineering is necessary, but that's a major research project in its own right. Techniques currently being used for natural language processing are probably where I'd start if I were to look at this again today.

Possibly the most fundamental problem I ran into is that it doesn't seem workable to use a scalar value to measure outcomes, so anything based on simple gradient descent is problematic. I think a practical outcome measurement must be at least three-dimensional -- it needs to include return, risk, and capital management. Arguably more, but the need for those three is easy to understand.
 

 

Time: Sun August 14, 2022 8:06 AM CFBB v1.2.0 47 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003