Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Just a thank you for the very helpful and prompt assistance and services. You provided me with noticeably superior service in my setup compared to a couple of other options I had looked at." - Comment from John
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"Awesome response, as usual. It is a sincere and refreshing pleasure to do business with DTN, compared to your competition." - Comment from Ryan
"You are either overstaffed or people just don't have problems with your feed because customer support always answers the phone quickly." - Comment from Jay via Email
"I am very happy I changed. I love the product, but more so I am thrilled with Tech Support. You are knowledgeable, polite, pleasant and professional." - Comment from Pat
"Excellent datafeed !!!" - Comment from Arely
"As a past ******* customer(and not a happy one), IQ Feed by DTN is a much better and cheaper product with great customer support. I have had no problems at all since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum
"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark
"Thanks for following up with me. You guys do a great job in tech support." - Comment from Phelps
"Thank God for your Data Feed as the only Zippers I see are on my pants (LOL), and no more 200 pip spikes to mess up charts." - Comment from Spiro via Email
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Product Support »IQFeed 3rd Party Software Support »Tick, Second and Minute Data in HistoryLookup3
Author Topic: Tick, Second and Minute Data in HistoryLookup3 (2 messages, Page 1 of 1)

ericm
-DTN Evangelist-
Posts: 145
Joined: Mar 31, 2008


Posted: Mar 8, 2009 02:11 PM          Msg. 1 of 2
I am comparing data retrieved by "ReqHistoryTickDatapoints" with data retrieved by "ReqHistoryIntervalDatapoints," using two different intervals for the latter: 60 seconds and 1 second. Please consult the attached Word file to illustrate the question.

The requested data begin March 6 of this year. They do not match up at the start because of the number of records requested, but they come into synch at 15:54:46. There are two Ticks for this second (green highlight), and they are matched correctly in the Minute data with the 15:55:00 record, both as to price and volume. The next two Ticks at 15:55:16 (blue highlight) also match the minute data, both as to volume and the different prices of the Ticks. These data are also found in the Second data, although one would have expected the time specification to have been at the Second level, not the Minute level.

When we come to the group of 19 Ticks for 16:46 (yellow highlight), we still get a correct grouping in the Minute data (shown in 16:47:00). But one would have expected five separate records in the Second data because the 19 different ticks occurred in 5 different seconds. Instead, we get the same grouping we got in the Minute data. In fact, it is clear that the Second and Minute data do not differ at all.

Perhaps there is some specification for a minimum limit to the interval specification, but I have not found it. I'd appreciate some help on this.

N.B. When I went to attach the Word document, I notice that you don't allow .doc files, only .txt files, so the highlighting is gone. But I think I have included enough information that you can easily mark the groupings yourself.

Eric



File Attached: IQFeed Results.txt (downloaded 984 times)

DTN_Steve_S
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 2093
Joined: Nov 21, 2005


Posted: Mar 9, 2009 10:26 AM          Msg. 2 of 2
Eric, you are correct. This bit of information apparently never got added to the documentation. The protocol was designed to allow second intervals in the future but it is currently being limited to minutes. I will make sure the documentation gets updated to reduce confusion on this.
Edited by DTN_Steve_S on Mar 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM
 

 

Time: Fri August 23, 2019 9:12 PM CFBB v1.2.0 0 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003