Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I would just like to say that IQFeed version 4 is running very well and I am very happy with its performance. I would also like to extend a big thanks for the fast and efficient help that I always receive. My questions and concerns are always addressed promptly. Way to go!" - Comment from Josh in CO.
"This beats the pants off CQG, I am definitely switching to the ProphetX 3.0!" - Comment from Stephen
"If you are serious about your trading I would not rely on IB data for serious daytrading. Took me a while to justify the cost of IQ Feed and in the end, it's just a 2 point stop on ES. Better safe than sorry" - Comment from Public Forum
"I ran your IQFeed DDE vs. my broker vs. a level II window for some slow-moving options. I would see the level II quote change, then your feed update instantaneously. My broker's DDE, however, would take as much as 30 seconds to update. I am not chasing milliseconds, but half a minute is unacceptable." - Comment from Rob
"Thanks for the great product and support. During this week of high volume trading, my QuoteTracker + IQ Feed setup never missed a beat. Also, thanks for your swiftness in responding to data issues. I was on ******* for a few years before I made the switch over early this year, and wish I had done it a long time ago." - Comment from Ken
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"I "bracket trade" all major news releases and I have not found one lag or glitch with DTN.IQ feed. I am very comfortable with their feed under all typical news conditions (Fed releases, employment numbers, etc)." - Comment from Public Forum
"Everything is working great ! Very impressive client. The news refreshes better and is more pertinent than the ******* feed I paid $ 100/month for. I Also like the charts a lot." - Comment from Leon
"Interactive Brokers tick data was inconsistent, so I have switched to using DTN exclusively. It is great to no longer have to worry about my datafeed all day long." - Comment from Philippe
"This is an excellent value, the system is generous (allowing for 500 stocks) and stable (and really is tick-by-tick), and the support is fantastic." - Comment from Shirin via Email
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »IQFeed Developer »IQFeed Developer Support »Historical API Issue
Author Topic: Historical API Issue (7 messages, Page 1 of 1)

AlexK
-Interested User-
Posts: 12
Joined: Oct 2, 2017


Posted: Oct 2, 2017 08:32 AM          Msg. 1 of 7
Hello,

We're seeing a fairly significant issue with the HDT Historical API. Problem:

When we take Lead Hog (as an example), and run the API daily, we get a certain set of prices each day. In this example, on 7-24-17, Lean Hog is at price point $80.725 when we call the API each day in July. If we we wait and run the same HDT Historical API on say, October 1st, for the same day and commodity, we get a price of $66.975.

So, the same API yields different data, depending on when it's called. This is a huge problem for us and am wondering if there's a different API we should be calling historically, or if you see the same issue?

Thank you.

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Oct 2, 2017 08:49 AM          Msg. 2 of 7
Good morning,

I believe this is related to the post below. If you look at the underlying contracts you will find the data has not changed. It is just on the continuous contracts where this will be seen, as the contracts being reported for certain dates will have changed completely.

Also, in case this is relevant, if you are using the @HE#C symbologies, those prices see adjustments at every contract expiration. If you want the prices to be unadjusted, be sure to just use @HE# instead.

Tim

http://forums.dtn.com/index.cfm?page=topic&topicID=4377

"Based on customer feedback, effective this evening we will be changing the roll users for @LE (Live Cattle), @HE (Lean Hogs) and @LB (Lumber) contracts to roll 2 weeks prior to expiration. This will provide continuation chart data that will more closely follow volume/OI on these contracts."

AlexK
-Interested User-
Posts: 12
Joined: Oct 2, 2017


Posted: Oct 2, 2017 09:10 AM          Msg. 3 of 7
We are using @xx#, NOT the adjusted continuous, and we are getting these different results based on WHEN the same API is run

AlexK
-Interested User-
Posts: 12
Joined: Oct 2, 2017


Posted: Oct 2, 2017 09:14 AM          Msg. 4 of 7
Thank you for the quick response.

We are not using #C, ever. We are always using the unadjusted # on our API calls. In the example I gave you for July, we get different data back depending on whether we call the API on a daily basis through July vs calling the API to provide that July data later on (August, Sept, Oct, whatever).

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Oct 2, 2017 09:39 AM          Msg. 5 of 7
@HEQ17 has the open of 80.725 that you mentioned.

But, when we changed the roll dates on our end which govern the continuous contracts, it changed the emphasis from @HEQ17 to @HEV17

And if were to look, you would find that @HEV17 shows the open you mentioned at 66.975 for the date 7-24-2017.

It was the change of the roll dates that would have caused this. If you wanted to have a rolling contract that would not be subject to this type of change (albiet these changes are rare) you would have to build your continuous contracts from the underlying daily data.

Tim

AlexK
-Interested User-
Posts: 12
Joined: Oct 2, 2017


Posted: Oct 2, 2017 12:14 PM          Msg. 6 of 7
Thank you, again. So just to confirm: can you provide that continuous contract data in an API call historically or would I have to build that out myself in some manner?

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Oct 2, 2017 12:21 PM          Msg. 7 of 7
If you want it to look like it was before, then yes, you would have to create that yourself. Though in my opinion, the data before was not using the most active contract, it was simply based on expiration. Therefore, I feel, that the new data is a better indication of where the market was comparatively to where we had it previously.

Tim
 

 

Time: Mon March 30, 2020 12:19 PM CFBB v1.2.0 15 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003