Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I've been using IQFeed 4 in a multi-threaded situation for the last week or two on 2600 symbols or so with 100 simultaneous daily charts, and I have had 100% responsiveness." - Comment from Scott
"I'm very glad I switched to IQFeed. It's working perfectly with no lag, even during fast market conditions." - Comment from Andy via Email
"I have been using IQFeed now for a few years in MultiCharts and I have zero complaints. Very, very rare to have any data hiccups or anything at all go wrong." - Comment from Public Forum
"IQFeed version 4 is a real screamer compared to anything else I have seen." - Comment from Tom
"This is an excellent value, the system is generous (allowing for 500 stocks) and stable (and really is tick-by-tick), and the support is fantastic." - Comment from Shirin via Email
"If you are serious about your trading I would not rely on IB data for serious daytrading. Took me a while to justify the cost of IQ Feed and in the end, it's just a 2 point stop on ES. Better safe than sorry" - Comment from Public Forum
"I would just like to say that IQFeed version 4 is running very well and I am very happy with its performance. I would also like to extend a big thanks for the fast and efficient help that I always receive. My questions and concerns are always addressed promptly. Way to go!" - Comment from Josh in CO.
"Just a thank you for the very helpful and prompt assistance and services. You provided me with noticeably superior service in my setup compared to a couple of other options I had looked at." - Comment from John
"I just wanted to say how happy I am with your service. I was able to download the API docs last week and I was able to replicate Interactive Brokers historical bar queries and realtime bar queries over the weekend. That was about one of the fastest integrations that I've ever done and it works perfectly!!!!" - Comment from Jason via Email
"I am very happy I changed. I love the product, but more so I am thrilled with Tech Support. You are knowledgeable, polite, pleasant and professional." - Comment from Pat
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »NEW IQFEED FORUMS »Data Questions »Noob question regarding tick level bid and ask statistics
Author Topic: Noob question regarding tick level bid and ask statistics (3 messages, Page 1 of 1)

Hoopster
-Interested User-
Posts: 2
Joined: Oct 4, 2019


Posted: Oct 5, 2019 08:51 AM          Msg. 1 of 3
Hi everyone, I'm new to this forum though a long term IQFeed customer.

I collect historical tick data from IQFeed via QCollector Expert For DTN. I want to determine and analyze the mix of at-bid vs at-ask trades. I determine a midpoint, ie ((ask-bid)/2)+bid, then any assign the trade as at-ask if the trade price is above the midpoint, and vice versa.

Even if I collect only a vigorous up-trend with minimal pull-backs, I get a higher number of at-bids than at-asks.

Should I not see more asks than bids during an up-trend, and vice versa?

Hoopster
-Interested User-
Posts: 2
Joined: Oct 4, 2019


Posted: Oct 5, 2019 03:33 PM          Msg. 2 of 3
I spotted "Trade Aggressor" (?!?) in my reading and found out it is exactly what I was trying to determine by comparing tick price to the reported bid and ask in the trade.

Great to know, but I have about 5 yrs of accumulated tick data for back-testing.

Can anyone tell me why comparing the price to the bid and ask in a tick record does not seem to work?

DTN_Gary_Stephen
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 394
Joined: Jul 3, 2019


Posted: Oct 14, 2019 10:07 AM          Msg. 3 of 3
I can give you a little information about the Trade Aggressor field. As of Protocol 6.1, which was released about a month ago, the Trade Aggressor is explicitly reported. The field is available in both watch and historical requests, but the watch command has to be customized to do so via a http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/DynamicFieldsets.cfm]Dynamic Fieldset. This will be available for the ICE and CME exchanges going forward; there is relatively little historical data as the exchanges only recently started reporting this.

To your other question:

Quote: Can anyone tell me why comparing the price to the bid and ask in a tick record does not seem to work?


There have been entire academic studies devoted to that question, such as:

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b9b9/257d161bb6fee796dd9a1b9bb725abf3b7b3.pdf

https://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/14512/algorithm-to-detect-the-aggressor-side-of-a-trade

I can't really advise you on how to design an algorithm, so I hope the above links are helpful. I can answer any questions you may have about the data the API returns.

Sincerely,
Gary Stephen
DTN IQFeed Implementation Support Specialist
 

 

Time: Wed April 24, 2024 11:18 PM CFBB v1.2.0 8 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003