Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!
(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)
"I used to have *******, but they are way more money for the same thing. I have had no probs with data from DTN since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum Post"Very impressed with the quality of your feed - ******* is a real donkey in comparison." - Comment from A.C. via Email"IQFeed version 4 is a real screamer compared to anything else I have seen." - Comment from Tom"I just wanted to tell you what a fine job you have been doing. While *******, from what I hear, has been down and out, off and on, IQ feed has held like a champ this week." - Comment from Shirin"You are much better than lawyers or the phone company because you answer the phone when I call! I just love your customer service." - Comment from Isreal"I just wanted to let u know that your data feed/service is by far the best!!! Your unfiltered tick data is excellent for reading order flow and none of your competitors delivers this quality of data!" - Comment from Peter via Email"I ran your IQFeed DDE vs. my broker vs. a level II window for some slow-moving options. I would see the level II quote change, then your feed update instantaneously. My broker's DDE, however, would take as much as 30 seconds to update. I am not chasing milliseconds, but half a minute is unacceptable." - Comment from Rob"My broker in Davenport suggested I give you a try as he uses your service and says its the best." - Comment from Bill via RT Chat"I'm satisfied with IQFeed. It's the most reliable and fastest quote feed I have ever used. Although I'm a resident in China, it's still very fast!" - Comment from Xiaofei"Awesome response, as usual. It is a sincere and refreshing pleasure to do business with DTN, compared to your competition." - Comment from Ryan
Topic: Noob question regarding tick level bid and ask statistics (3 messages,
Page 1 of 1)
Posts: 2 Joined: Oct 4, 2019
Posted: Oct 5, 2019 08:51 AM
Msg. 1 of 3
Hi everyone, I'm new to this forum though a long term IQFeed customer.
I collect historical tick data from IQFeed via QCollector Expert For DTN. I want to determine and analyze the mix of at-bid vs at-ask trades. I determine a midpoint, ie ((ask-bid)/2)+bid, then any assign the trade as at-ask if the trade price is above the midpoint, and vice versa.
Even if I collect only a vigorous up-trend with minimal pull-backs, I get a higher number of at-bids than at-asks.
Should I not see more asks than bids during an up-trend, and vice versa?
Posts: 2 Joined: Oct 4, 2019
Posted: Oct 5, 2019 03:33 PM
Msg. 2 of 3
I spotted "Trade Aggressor" (?!?) in my reading and found out it is exactly what I was trying to determine by comparing tick price to the reported bid and ask in the trade.
Great to know, but I have about 5 yrs of accumulated tick data for back-testing.
Can anyone tell me why comparing the price to the bid and ask in a tick record does not seem to work?
I can give you a little information about the Trade Aggressor field. As of Protocol 6.1, which was released about a month ago, the Trade Aggressor is explicitly reported. The field is available in both watch and historical requests, but the watch command has to be customized to do so via a http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/DynamicFieldsets.cfm]Dynamic Fieldset. This will be available for the ICE and CME exchanges going forward; there is relatively little historical data as the exchanges only recently started reporting this.
To your other question:
Quote: Can anyone tell me why comparing the price to the bid and ask in a tick record does not seem to work?
There have been entire academic studies devoted to that question, such as:
I can't really advise you on how to design an algorithm, so I hope the above links are helpful. I can answer any questions you may have about the data the API returns. Sincerely, Gary Stephen DTN IQFeed Implementation Support Specialist