Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I'm satisfied with IQFeed. It's the most reliable and fastest quote feed I have ever used. Although I'm a resident in China, it's still very fast!" - Comment from Xiaofei
"Its working FABULOUSLY for me!! Holy cow...there has been so much I've been missing lately, and with this feed and Linnsoft software...I'm in the game now." - Comment from Chris R.
"For anyone considering using DTN.IQ for a data feed, my experience with the quality of data and the tech support has been very positive." - Comment from Public Forum
"I ran your IQFeed DDE vs. my broker vs. a level II window for some slow-moving options. I would see the level II quote change, then your feed update instantaneously. My broker's DDE, however, would take as much as 30 seconds to update. I am not chasing milliseconds, but half a minute is unacceptable." - Comment from Rob
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin
"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark
"I've been using Neoticker RT with IQFeed for two months, and I'm very happy with both of the products (I've had IQFeed for two years with very few complaints). The service from both companies is exceptional." - Comment from Public Forum
"As a past ******* customer(and not a happy one), IQ Feed by DTN is a much better and cheaper product with great customer support. I have had no problems at all since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum
"I have been using IQFeed now for a few years in MultiCharts and I have zero complaints. Very, very rare to have any data hiccups or anything at all go wrong." - Comment from Public Forum
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: aQuant
About Contact
Joined: Jul 20, 2012 05:05 PM
Last Post: Jun 24, 2022 04:55 PM
Last Visit: Jun 24, 2022 04:55 PM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
aQuant has contributed to 47 posts out of 20658 total posts (0.23%) in 3,678 days (0.01 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Datafeed Wish List » Sequential Level1 and Level2 updates. Jun 24, 2022 04:55 PM (Total replies: 10)

Great, I am glad it's being debated at least. Thank you.

IQFeed Datafeed Wish List » Sequential Level1 and Level2 updates. Jun 17, 2022 08:14 PM (Total replies: 10)

Hello,

as I originally requested this (and subsequently inquired) I thought I would add this note.
It's not true that MBO or any existing enhancements in 6.2 will 'obviate' this request that I posted years ago and never got any good response on it. I can provide specific real examples as to why it's impossible to synchronize the two distinct L1 and L2 (MBO or MBP) data feeds in the current approach-even if they all carry precise time stamps to microsecond (which they currently do for CME). I outlined (in my 10/23/2019 post) how this option could be offered relatively easily (with most burden offloaded to the interested developers-however, making it at least theoretically possible to synchronize the two feeds). Even more so confounding that you must already be parsing this field in the process. In summary, any sophisticated analysis that requires the knowledge of trade match events and their relation to order book changes does need this and to be able to do it deterministically and with guaranteed correctness the two feeds must be obtained with sequential IDs (even if on different channels/threads as is currently the case).

IQFeed Developer Support » MICRO WTI CRUDE OIL FUTURES Jul 13, 2021 07:22 PM (Total replies: 4)

Is the depth data available for this product? I am only seeing a 'q,QMCLQ21' message in MBO feed.


Yes, but I am referring to real-time L1 data stream. I just pulled the raw data as received for ES, here it is for a few lines:
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,491,186,183,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:50.321955,12:59:27.926377,C,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,490,186,,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:51.552581,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,488,186,,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:51.552818,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,489,186,,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:51.564067,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,490,186,,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:51.788146,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,489,186,,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:51.794049,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,490,186,,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:51.805153,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,489,186,,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:51.964915,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881690,1,3229.50,3228.75,490,186,,13:01:51.552581,27215001,13:01:52.506262,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881691,1,3229.50,3228.75,490,186,183,13:01:52.787067,27215002,13:01:52.506262,12:59:27.926377,C,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881691,1,3229.50,3228.75,489,186,,13:01:52.787067,27215002,13:01:52.787067,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881691,1,3229.50,3228.75,488,186,,13:01:52.787067,27215002,13:01:52.787329,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881691,1,3229.50,3228.75,491,186,,13:01:52.787067,27215002,13:01:53.235752,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.50,881691,1,3229.50,3228.75,490,186,,13:01:52.787067,27215002,13:01:53.328002,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.75,881693,2,3229.50,3228.75,490,186,173,13:01:53.354236,27215003,13:01:53.328002,12:59:27.926377,C,
Q,@ESU20,3229.75,881693,2,3229.50,3228.75,491,186,,13:01:53.354236,27215003,13:01:53.354478,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.75,881693,2,3229.50,3228.75,491,186,,13:01:53.354236,27215003,13:01:53.456365,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.75,881693,2,3229.50,3228.75,490,186,,13:01:53.354236,27215003,13:01:53.465140,12:59:27.926377,b,
Q,@ESU20,3229.75,881693,2,3229.50,3228.75,487,186,,13:01:53.354236,27215003,13:01:54.535890,12:59:27.926377,b,

This indicates bid and ask of 3229.50 and 3228.75 respectively, so crossed. Note that ask size is 'frozen' at 186 and not updating. It's a case of stale ask in this case.


I am seeing this issue again today in ESU0 contract, roughly between 11:40am and 12:07pm CST. Support, could you please look into it?

IQFeed Developer Support » All Quotes Delayed By About 2 Minutes Today. Apr 21, 2020 07:23 PM (Total replies: 5)

I noticed a related issue. At night (~7pm CST) the L2 feed often lags the L1 feed, this is at a time when the activity is fairly low. Did anyone notcice similar? I have seen this for a few nights in a row now.

IQFeed Datafeed Wish List » Sequential Level1 and Level2 updates. Feb 7, 2020 02:16 PM (Total replies: 10)

Done.

IQFeed Datafeed Wish List » Sequential Level1 and Level2 updates. Oct 23, 2019 08:18 PM (Total replies: 10)

I requested this 5 years ago... but I understand the separation of L1 and L2 feeds is probably important and convenient organization of the feed data.

However, can we request the messages to contain a new field, message sequence ID, that comes directly from the exchange for both L1 and L2 update messages? This would allow the client to synchronize on their end. And you must be already parsing those from say CME in your data processing anyway. You could just pass them along (as optional field) to the client.
See
https://www.cmegroup.com/confluence/display/EPICSANDBOX/MDP+3.0+FIX+Tag+Library
and tag 83 message field described as:
Tag: RptSeq
FIX Type: Int
Description: MD Entry sequence number per instrument update. Reset weekly.

IQFeed Developer Wish List » Binary Protocol Sep 23, 2019 08:35 PM (Total replies: 12)

Hi Stephen,

I emailed my request to support as instructed. Thanks.

IQFeed Developer Wish List » Binary Protocol Sep 22, 2019 05:07 PM (Total replies: 12)

I agree, IQFeed developers should be able to handle binary protocol just as easily and it should be much more efficient to transfer to clients too. Especially with the hopefully coming soon (?) Market By Order depth protocol this would seem quite desirable to limit the number of bytes sent over the network.


I am using 5.2.5.0.


In the post above yours I didn't show where it began, I would have to look for that. I can try to locate it later.
I am definitely willing to supply a lot more information to anyone who will as a result help find a solution. But I would like to see some involvement of IQFeed support in this. I can help them nail this if they really want to solve it...


Based on the raw level1 messages it appears that one side stops updating, in the below case it was bid that got 'stuck' at 51.51, there may be other ways this happens, I didn't study them all:

Q,QCLH19,51.36,465114,2,51.51,51.37,1,46,183,11:19:10.391894,11321247,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.391882,C,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465114,2,51.51,51.37,1,47,,11:19:10.391894,11321247,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.392009,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465115,1,51.51,51.37,1,47,183,11:19:10.392111,11321248,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.392009,C,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465115,1,51.51,51.37,1,48,,11:19:10.392111,11321248,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.392418,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465116,1,51.51,51.37,1,48,183,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.392418,C,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.37,1,48,183,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.392418,C,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.37,1,49,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.392538,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.37,1,50,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.392633,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.37,1,51,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.393159,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,6,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.393887,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,7,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.395510,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,8,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.395553,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,10,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.395590,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,13,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.395627,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,14,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.395727,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,15,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.395840,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,18,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.395916,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,20,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.396142,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,22,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.396215,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,23,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.396250,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,24,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.396328,a,
Q,QCLH19,51.36,465117,1,51.51,51.36,1,25,,11:19:10.392432,11321249,11:17:37.737313,11:19:10.396725,a,


It hasn't, for example today (2/11/2019) it occurred in CL, ES, 6E between 10:18-10:23am CST.

IQFeed Developer Support » Incorrect L2 data for futures Jan 29, 2019 12:27 PM (Total replies: 3)

Here is an example of a few situations from yesterday where best bid is reported above best ask (MD01 updates below). This is from 1/28/2019 CLH19 instrument.

QCLH19,MD01,52.99,52.89,4,5,01:41:26.756957,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD02,52.98,52.9,10,1,01:41:26.756957,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD03,52.87,52.91,57,13,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD04,52.86,52.95,67,8,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD05,52.85,52.96,70,3,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD06,52.84,52.97,53,9,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD07,52.83,52.98,90,3,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD08,52.82,52.99,81,3,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD09,52.81,53.,48,35,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD10,52.8,53.01,109,23,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,T,
QCLH19,MD01,52.99,52.89,4,6,01:41:26.756957,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757075,T,T,T,


QCLH19,MD01,52.85,52.84,31,2,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD02,52.82,52.85,27,56,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD03,52.81,52.86,55,33,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD04,52.8,52.87,50,42,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD05,52.79,52.88,36,26,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD06,52.78,52.89,40,31,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD07,52.77,52.9,38,70,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD08,52.76,52.91,34,31,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD09,52.75,52.92,47,42,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD10,52.74,52.93,37,47,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,T,
QCLH19,MD02,52.82,52.85,27,6,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613386,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD03,52.81,52.86,55,22,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613386,T,T,T,
QCLH19,MD03,52.81,52.86,55,4,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613403,T,T,T,

QCLH19,MD01,52.42,52.41,3,2,09:07:55.677653,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD02,52.41,52.43,10,15,09:07:55.677676,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD03,52.39,52.44,37,45,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD04,52.38,52.45,61,41,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD05,52.37,52.46,41,49,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD06,52.36,52.47,60,46,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD07,52.35,52.48,98,42,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD08,52.34,52.49,40,33,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD09,52.33,52.5,47,37,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD10,52.32,52.51,62,24,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,T,

IQFeed Developer Support » Incorrect L2 data for futures Jan 28, 2019 09:31 AM (Total replies: 3)

Yes, I am aware of the Bid/AskInfoValid flag. Note this line though:

QCLH19,MD10,53.05,54.27,90,14,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,T,

which indicates end of group updates. It still has the 54.27 ask (this time all are flagged valid). This ask is definitely not valid, about 100 ticks off of correct price.

IQFeed Developer Support » Incorrect L2 data for futures Jan 26, 2019 10:36 PM (Total replies: 3)

I often see incorrect/nonsensical L2 data right after a large trade takes out a few levels on the DOM (depth of market). For example, this is from CLH9 1/22/2019 at 06:01.44.16260am EST the ask price is off by almost hundred ticks for a few updates in a row. Then at 06:01:44.162895 it 'comes back' to normal.

I have other examples, where crossed bid/ask MD0x levels are reported for a number of updates (typically following a trade that sweeps a few levels). Is this something that can be fixed?

QCLH19,MD01,53.13,53.15,10,18,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.021207,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD02,53.12,53.16,34,25,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.970119,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD03,53.11,53.17,54,22,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.970383,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD04,53.1,53.18,76,28,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.883353,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD05,53.09,53.19,32,28,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.874302,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD06,53.08,53.2,37,22,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.011207,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD07,53.07,53.21,80,23,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.037856,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD08,53.06,53.22,38,29,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.037856,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD09,53.05,53.23,90,18,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.874302,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD10,53.04,53.24,39,24,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.874302,T,T,T,
QCLH19,MD01,54.18,54.18,0,3886,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,F,T,F,
QCLH19,MD02,53.13,54.19,10,9,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD03,53.12,54.2,10,23,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD04,53.11,54.21,41,26,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD05,53.1,54.22,76,15,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD06,53.09,54.23,32,14,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD07,53.08,54.24,37,8,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD08,53.07,54.25,80,22,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD09,53.06,54.26,38,8,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD10,53.05,54.27,90,14,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,T,
QCLH19,MD01,53.11,53.12,49,19,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD02,53.1,53.13,95,1,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD03,53.09,53.15,32,18,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD04,53.08,53.16,37,25,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD05,53.07,53.17,80,22,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD06,53.06,53.18,38,28,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD07,53.05,53.19,90,28,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD08,53.04,53.2,39,22,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD09,53.03,53.21,55,23,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F,
QCLH19,MD10,53.02,53.22,48,29,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,T,


Today was particularly bad, CL and currency data (CL, 6E, 6A,6J) all had this issue for hours after 9:31am central time.


I have been seeing invalid and stale market data in various insturments (CL, ES) in the last month or so (could be slightly longer). It occurs at seemingly random times and usually lasts about 10 minutes sometimes up to an hour.
Example from today: 10:08-10:20am, 3:05-3:15pm CST in ES. Here is a snapshot of L1 updates from one of the periods:

Q,@ESZ18,2738.25,3859981,2,2738.00,2733.75,64,1,183,16:08:31.779471,271740673,16:08:31.770457,16:05:00.164499,C,
Q,@ESZ18,2738.25,3859982,1,2738.00,2733.75,64,1,183,16:08:31.779471,271740673,16:08:31.770457,16:05:00.164499,C,
Q,@ESZ18,2738.25,3859983,1,2738.00,2733.75,64,1,183,16:08:31.779471,271740673,16:08:31.770457,16:05:00.164499,C,
Q,@ESZ18,2738.25,3859984,1,2738.00,2733.75,64,1,183,16:08:31.779471,271740673,16:08:31.770457,16:05:00.164499,C,
Q,@EDU20,96.7650,270309,2,96.7650,96.7700,8665,15942,,16:07:28.306149,9268532,16:08:31.734942,16:08:31.768035,a,
Q,@EDM19,96.9800,405656,2,96.9800,96.9850,7411,30599,,16:00:00.036589,9268244,16:08:31.753186,16:08:31.768255,a,
Q,@EDU20,96.7650,270309,2,96.7650,96.7700,8665,15824,,16:07:28.306149,9268532,16:08:31.734942,16:08:31.768255,a,
Q,@EDH20,96.7650,342864,2,96.7650,96.7700,4985,27436,,16:07:28.306149,9268541,16:08:31.734935,16:08:31.768255,a,
Q,@EDM20,96.7600,348765,3,96.7600,96.7650,6401,20909,,16:07:28.306149,9268536,16:08:31.733403,16:08:31.768255,a,
Q,@ESZ18,2738.25,3859984,1,2738.25,2733.75,13,1,,16:08:31.779471,271740673,16:08:31.779481,16:05:00.164499,b,
Q,@ESZ18,2738.25,3859984,1,2738.25,2733.75,14,1,,16:08:31.779471,271740673,16:08:31.779658,16:05:00.164499,b,
Q,@ESZ18,2738.25,3859984,1,2738.25,2733.75,15,1,,16:08:31.779471,271740673,16:08:31.779676,16:05:00.164499,b,

In the above (and with my message structure) the best bid/ask data are crossed and indicating 2738.25,2733.75 for bid and ask for ES, clearly nonsensical. This same stale/invalid bid/ask info stays such for the period in question. Notice that ED above (eurodollar) is just fine as are most other contracts. This has been happening for over a month and I alerted iqfeed support to it. Initially they expressed it was due to testing MBO feed. When I contended those reasons they claimed they had some issues with CME feed. Whatever it is, this is not getting fixed and I am concerned this is not getting the priority it deserves. Any advanced developer depends on full/complete/correct data-as the feed proclaims to provide. Please correct this issue. I can provide more details if needed.


Is anyone looking into this? Looking in the past (year 2015 for example), this problem used to affect more securities but now seems to only linger still in treasury futures.


Time: Sun August 14, 2022 7:01 AM CFBB v1.2.0 16 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003