|
Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!
(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)
"If you want customer service that answers the phone, your best bet is IQFeed. I cannot stop praising them or their technical support. They are always there for you, and they are quick. I have used ****** too but the best value is IQFeed." - Comment from Public Forum
"Boy, probably spent a thousand hours trying to get ******* API to work right. And now two hours to have something running with IQFeed. Hmmm, guess I was pretty stupid to fight rather than switch all this time. And have gotten more customer service from you guys already than total from them… in five years." - Comment from Jim
"Can I get another account from you? I am tired of ******* going down so often" - Comment from George
"IQFeed version 4 is a real screamer compared to anything else I have seen." - Comment from Tom
"I've never had DTN go out on me since switching. ******* would go down a couple times every month when I was using them." - Comment from Bryce in AL.
"Awesome response, as usual. It is a sincere and refreshing pleasure to do business with DTN, compared to your competition." - Comment from Ryan
"I'm satisfied with IQFeed. It's the most reliable and fastest quote feed I have ever used. Although I'm a resident in China, it's still very fast!" - Comment from Xiaofei
"DTN has never given me problems. It is incredibly stable. In fact I've occasionally lost the data feed from Interactive Brokers, but still been able to trade because I'm getting good data from DTN." - Comment from Leighton
"I used to have *******, but they are way more money for the same thing. I have had no probs with data from DTN since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"Interactive Brokers tick data was inconsistent, so I have switched to using DTN exclusively. It is great to no longer have to worry about my datafeed all day long." - Comment from Philippe
|
|
|
|
| Joined: |
Jan 5, 2018 04:58 PM |
| Last Post: |
Jan 5, 2018 05:16 PM |
| Last Visit: |
Jan 8, 2018 06:46 AM |
| Website: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Occupation: |
|
| Interests: |
|
|
| AIM: |
|
| ICQ: |
|
| MSN IM: |
|
| Yahoo IM: |
|
|
fatdan has contributed to 1 posts out of 21194 total posts
(0.00%) in 2,322 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
Hi Guys,
I am finding it very difficult to reliably pull historical data.
I am using my own integration, however the exact same behaviour is exhibited in your sample apps also.
If I request 500 (or less) ticks of data, it works 100% of the time.
If I request 0 tick of data (all), it almost never works (worked for about a 2 hour period - twice)
If I request 1000 ticks, it is the same as requesting 0 (all) ticks. In behaviour that is.
I am changing the default sort order of the data.
I am using the symbol as the RequestID
So an example request would be:
HTX,QCLG18,0,1,QCLG18
I have also tried days (10)
HTD,QCLG18,10,,,,1,QCLG18
Right at the start I was almost always receiving some data, often very delayed between chunks (30 seconds to several minutes)
Now, I don't even get a response from the servers. No data - as if the request was never sent/processed.
When it works (it has not for 2 days now) the data screams down say (1-3 MB per second)
Over the last few days I have mainly tried to pull tick data for QCLG18 so you should be able to see the request hopefully :)
Cheers
|
|
Home
Search
Register
Login
Recent Posts