Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I "bracket trade" all major news releases and I have not found one lag or glitch with DTN.IQ feed. I am very comfortable with their feed under all typical news conditions (Fed releases, employment numbers, etc)." - Comment from Public Forum
"I've been using Neoticker RT with IQFeed for two months, and I'm very happy with both of the products (I've had IQFeed for two years with very few complaints). The service from both companies is exceptional." - Comment from Public Forum
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"Thank God for your Data Feed as the only Zippers I see are on my pants (LOL), and no more 200 pip spikes to mess up charts." - Comment from Spiro via Email
"Previously I was using *******. IQFeed is WAY more economical, and for my charting needs is just as good, if not better." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark
"I have been using IQFeed now for a few years in MultiCharts and I have zero complaints. Very, very rare to have any data hiccups or anything at all go wrong." - Comment from Public Forum
"Its working FABULOUSLY for me!! Holy cow...there has been so much I've been missing lately, and with this feed and Linnsoft software...I'm in the game now." - Comment from Chris R.
"Can I get another account from you? I am tired of ******* going down so often" - Comment from George
"Just a quick one to say I'm very impressed so far :) The documentation for developers is excellent and I've quickly managed to get an app written to do historical downloads. The system is very robust and pretty quick considering the extent of data that's available. The support guys have been very helpful too, in combination with the forums it's been plain sailing so far!" - Comment from Adam
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts
Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: trader_8317
About Contact
Joined: Sep 29, 2019 03:11 PM
Last Post: Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM
Last Visit: Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
trader_8317 has contributed to 3 posts out of 19450 total posts (0.02%) in 186 days (0.02 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM (Total replies: 5)

Hi Gary,

I've just re-run it, and I can confirm that it's now working correctly (with 0 in the TradeAggressor field). Weird that it gave that result before.

Cheers!

IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Oct 2, 2019 03:35 AM (Total replies: 5)

Hi Gary,

Thanks for getting back to me. Please comment on this thread when the issue is resolved.

Also, thanks for the extra detail around data availability - that's useful to know.

IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Sep 29, 2019 03:18 PM (Total replies: 5)

Hi,

I'm trying to execute a HTT request, as per the example on: http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/HistoricalviaTCPIP.cfm. I find that when I execute: "HTT,GOOGL,20190409 000000,20190409 235959,10,155959,160004,1,TESTREQUEST"
I get:
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391602,1203.6000,100,948999,1203.2900,1203.3900,10031,E,5,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391610,1203.7100,200,949199,1203.2900,1203.3900,10032,E,5,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391615,1203.7700,50,949249,1203.2900,1203.3900,10033,O,5,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.479088,1202.6900,118,949367,1203.2900,1203.3900,5885,E,19,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.701530,1203.2900,1,949368,1203.2900,1203.3900,10034,O,5,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.215912,1202.6900,41,949409,1203.2900,1203.3900,5886,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.215982,1202.6900,6,949415,1203.2900,1203.3900,5887,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.227863,1202.6900,14,949429,1203.2900,1203.3900,5888,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.259771,1202.6900,39,949468,1203.2900,1203.3900,5889,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:02.630410,1203.2900,100,949568,1203.2900,1203.7100,10035,E,5,17,48,9,

This almost lines up with the example response given at the bottom of the link I gave, apart from the penultimate column (which I understand should be trade aggressor, with values 0-3) is 48. I've (at least tried to) set the protocol to 6.1. Could anyone shine any light on why my trade aggressor field appears to have an invalid value?

Thanks for your help in advance.


Time: Wed April 1, 2020 1:41 PM CFBB v1.2.0 16 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003