Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Just a quick one to say I'm very impressed so far :) The documentation for developers is excellent and I've quickly managed to get an app written to do historical downloads. The system is very robust and pretty quick considering the extent of data that's available. The support guys have been very helpful too, in combination with the forums it's been plain sailing so far!" - Comment from Adam
"I had always used ******* but for the past 2 weeks have been trying DTN IQFeed. Customer support has been extraordinary. They call just to make sure your problem hasn't recurred." - Comment from Public Forum
"Very impressed with the quality of your feed - ******* is a real donkey in comparison." - Comment from A.C. via Email
"If you are serious about your trading I would not rely on IB data for serious daytrading. Took me a while to justify the cost of IQ Feed and in the end, it's just a 2 point stop on ES. Better safe than sorry" - Comment from Public Forum
"I was on the phone with a friend who uses CQG and right after the Fed announcement, CQG was as much as 30 seconds behind DTN.IQ. Some quotes were off by as much as 15-18 cents. Your feed never missed a beat." - Comment from Roger
"It’s so nice to be working with real professionals!" - Comment from Len
"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin
"If someone needs the best quality data and backfill beyond what their broker provides at a rate that is the best in the industry, I highly recommend IQFeed." - Comment from Josh via Public Forum
"Boy, probably spent a thousand hours trying to get ******* API to work right. And now two hours to have something running with IQFeed. Hmmm, guess I was pretty stupid to fight rather than switch all this time. And have gotten more customer service from you guys already than total from them… in five years." - Comment from Jim
"This is an excellent value, the system is generous (allowing for 500 stocks) and stable (and really is tick-by-tick), and the support is fantastic." - Comment from Shirin via Email
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »IQFeed 3rd Party Software Support »IQ and Sierra charts
Author Topic: IQ and Sierra charts (3 messages, Page 1 of 1)

Dave
-Interested User-
Posts: 2
Joined: Oct 27, 2007


Posted: Oct 27, 2007 01:33 PM          Msg. 1 of 3
I have been using the IQ data with Sierra charts now for a few months and notice that my CPU usage is significantly higher with the IQ feed than other data feeds I have used.

Also, when comparing tick charts to volume charts I notice that each bar is exactly the amount of ticks I have it set for in the charts, while the bars in volume charts vary greatly from the amount I have set.

Any thoughts on why these are ocurring?

Thanks

DTN_Jay_Froscheiser
-VP, Product Operations-
Posts: 1746
Joined: May 3, 2004

DTN IQFeed/DTN.IQ/DTN NxCore


Posted: Oct 27, 2007 02:13 PM          Msg. 2 of 3
Hi Dave,

CPU will likely be higher with IQFeed due to the volume of data we send. Especially when compared with lower cost or free brokerage feeds, you will notice that we send every quote and trade from the exchange while others are sending aggregated, filtered or snapshot data. During peak market hours, this can equate to a decent percentage more data being sent and processed. We have just released a beta version of IQFeed that reduces the CPU utilization of the IQFeed client. I would suggest downloading and installing this to give it a shot and seeing if you notice a difference. It is available at www.iqfeed.net (click download).

I can only give a guess on the tick vs. volume bars issue since this is a function of the Sierra Charts software, not the feed. When counting ticks, each tick is equal to one. Thus, with a resolution of 1, you can easily define when the next bar should be built. When you look at volume bars, each tick can contain any number of shares/contracts. Thus, the chart needs to determine when to actually break to the next bar.

For example, a 100 tick chart knows to a resolution of 1 tick when it reaches 100. Thus, a new bar is built exactly every 100 ticks. On a 100 share/contract volume chart, the bar may have counted 90 shares/contracts, then receives a trade of 20 shares/contracts. It is up to the software to decide if it should create the new bar at 90 shares/contracts or add the next 20 and thus have 110 shares/contracts represented in that bar.

Hopefully that makes sense!

Jay Froscheiser
DTN - Trading Markets

Dave
-Interested User-
Posts: 2
Joined: Oct 27, 2007


Posted: Oct 28, 2007 07:41 AM          Msg. 3 of 3
Thanks Jay, I will try the beta version and take up the matter of volume charts with Sierra.

Thanks again
 

 

Time: Sun May 19, 2024 3:04 PM CFBB v1.2.0 10 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003