Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)

"I "bracket trade" all major news releases and I have not found one lag or glitch with DTN.IQ feed. I am very comfortable with their feed under all typical news conditions (Fed releases, employment numbers, etc)." - Comment from Public Forum
"I've been using Neoticker RT with IQFeed for two months, and I'm very happy with both of the products (I've had IQFeed for two years with very few complaints). The service from both companies is exceptional." - Comment from Public Forum
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"Thank God for your Data Feed as the only Zippers I see are on my pants (LOL), and no more 200 pip spikes to mess up charts." - Comment from Spiro via Email
"Previously I was using *******. IQFeed is WAY more economical, and for my charting needs is just as good, if not better." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark
"I have been using IQFeed now for a few years in MultiCharts and I have zero complaints. Very, very rare to have any data hiccups or anything at all go wrong." - Comment from Public Forum
"Its working FABULOUSLY for me!! Holy cow...there has been so much I've been missing lately, and with this feed and Linnsoft software...I'm in the game now." - Comment from Chris R.
"Can I get another account from you? I am tired of ******* going down so often" - Comment from George
"Just a quick one to say I'm very impressed so far :) The documentation for developers is excellent and I've quickly managed to get an app written to do historical downloads. The system is very robust and pretty quick considering the extent of data that's available. The support guys have been very helpful too, in combination with the forums it's been plain sailing so far!" - Comment from Adam
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Product Support »Data and Content Support »ISO orders on options not always showing as 0x3d trade condition
Author Topic: ISO orders on options not always showing as 0x3d trade condition (4 messages, Page 1 of 1)

Larry jag
-Interested User-
Posts: 30
Joined: Dec 28, 2015

Posted: Feb 24, 2016 12:16 PM          Msg. 1 of 4
I have recently started analysis from my end on intramarket sweeps for option exchanges (trade conditions=0x3d).
From what I have read on the topic and from the exchange and regulation documentation, once an order is
sent with this code as an ISO order, all resulting trades should be reported with this trade condition
(since there is almost a guarantee to fill because the book is sweeped accross all exchanges)

So looking at SBUX on FEB-23, I see a trade which I believe was sent to the exchange as a ISO order
(intramarket sweep order), the trade results don't show each reported trade with the 0x3d trade
condition in iqfeed. Here is the data I have (historical tick, using CEO command):

SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 10:09:12.513,4.9,1,1,4.85,4.95,17162907,C,13,45,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 10:09:31.704,4.85,5,6,4.8,4.9,17296825,C,18,20,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 11:04:24.736,4.92,10,16,4.85,4.95,33720319,C,88,45,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 11:08:36.912,4.9,1,17,4.9,5.0,35187012,C,18,20,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 11:09:30.120,4.9,19,36,4.9,5.0,35485583,C,18,20,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 13:20:51.104,5.25,1,37,5.15,5.3,59617450,C,26,20,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 13:33:12.535,5.14,6,43,5.05,5.2,61693366,C,17,45,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 13:33:12.535,5.14,4,47,5.05,5.2,61693367,O,17,45,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:13:09.230,5.0,4,51,4.95,5.05,76226759,C,9,20,
##### ISO order was execute HERE (99.99% sure it was ISO)
##### note that trade conditions show 01,20,and the last 3 trades for this order finally show 0x3D
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,18,69,5.05,5.15,79400601,C,88,01,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,14,83,5.05,5.15,79400602,C,88,01,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,8,91,5.05,5.15,79400603,C,88,01,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,5,96,5.05,5.15,79400603,C,88,01,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,4,100,5.05,5.15,79400604,C,88,01,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,1,101,5.05,5.15,79400605,C,88,01,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,1,102,5.05,5.15,79400605,C,88,01,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,79,181,5.05,5.15,79400608,C,108,20,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,28,209,5.05,5.15,79400610,C,108,20,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,77,286,5.05,5.15,79400612,C,108,20,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,56,342,5.05,5.15,79400613,C,108,20,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.478,5.15,118,460,5.05,5.15,79400614,C,108,20,
##### last 3 trades showing 3d are below.
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.481,5.15,556,1016,5.05,5.15,79400674,C,13,3D, <-- 3d=ISO now showing up
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.481,5.15,19,1035,5.05,5.15,79400675,C,17,3D,
SBUX1720A60,HTT_10_SBUX1720A60,2016-02-23 15:33:06.484,5.15,16,1051,5.05,5.15,79400772,C,17,3D,

Should not all trades starting from 15:33:06.478 show 0x3d?
From the tick trades, it looks like a sweep order was entered AFTERwards, but I find it hard to
believe because of the 3ms time difference between the other orders.

Another example (other way around):
ISO order was entered for NMBL, and trade conditions do show 0x3D. BUT if you look further below,
the trades start to be reported as 0x20 within 1ms of the original fill.

NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,15,15,0.2,0.45,46339033,C,18,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,1,16,0.45,0.45,46339034,C,18,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,2,18,0.45,0.45,46339034,C,26,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,21,39,0.45,0.45,46339034,C,108,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,45,84,0.45,0.45,46339035,C,108,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,85,169,0.45,0.45,46339035,C,88,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,54,223,0.45,0.45,46339036,C,108,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,56,279,0.45,0.45,46339037,C,108,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,21,300,0.45,0.45,46339037,C,26,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,76,376,0.45,0.45,46339038,C,88,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,50,426,0.45,0.45,46339038,C,88,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,46,472,0.45,0.45,46339039,C,88,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,15,487,0.45,0.45,46339040,C,26,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,36,523,0.45,0.45,46339040,C,108,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,10,533,0.45,0.45,46339040,C,108,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,10,543,0.45,0.45,46339042,C,88,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,15,558,0.45,0.45,46339043,C,26,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,11,569,0.45,0.45,46339044,C,108,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,25,594,0.45,0.45,46339050,C,12,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.44,15,609,0.45,0.45,46339050,C,5,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,10,619,0.45,0.45,46339050,C,5,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.769,0.45,51,670,0.45,0.45,46339053,C,12,20, <-- not 3d
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,10,680,0.45,0.45,46339068,C,18,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,82,762,0.45,0.45,46339068,C,9,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,53,815,0.45,0.45,46339078,C,121,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,134,949,0.45,0.45,46339083,C,16,3D,
#### no longer showing 3D - trade is only 1ms off of the 3D trade condition fill..
#### Also trade is at different trade market center from the original trade...making it highly suspect that
#### an HFT could jump the queue and fill it.
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,31,980,0.45,0.45,46339090,C,5,20, <-- not 3d
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,3,983,0.45,0.45,46339091,C,5,20,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,3,986,0.45,0.45,46339091,C,5,20,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,3,989,0.45,0.45,46339091,C,5,20,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,3,992,0.45,0.45,46339091,C,5,20,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.770,0.45,8,1000,0.45,0.45,46339091,C,5,20,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.771,0.45,1,1001,0.45,0.45,46339104,C,18,20,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.774,0.45,175,1176,0.45,0.45,46339259,C,13,3D,
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:08.784,0.45,10,1186,0.45,0.45,46339373,C,26,3D, <--- this could be a new order given 11 ms after original.
NMBL1618C7.5,HTT_10_NMBL1618C7.5,2016-02-23 11:07:26.986,0.45,814,2000,0.2,0.5,46428914,O,13,45, <------ not part of the original order (I believe)

Thanks in advance.

Larry jag
-Interested User-
Posts: 30
Joined: Dec 28, 2015

Posted: Mar 1, 2016 03:42 PM          Msg. 2 of 4
Can someone please answer my question. It has been a while since I posted it.

-Interested User-
Posts: 1
Joined: Apr 25, 2007

Posted: Mar 1, 2016 04:24 PM          Msg. 3 of 4
Larry jag,

We apologize for the delayed response. Our developers are currently investigating your issue. We hope to have an answer for you shortly.

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006

Posted: Mar 1, 2016 04:54 PM          Msg. 4 of 4
Hi Larry,

My apologies for the delay. I sent you an email concerning this. It sounds like you did not get it though. I was not able to confirm the messages that we received from the exchange on the day you reported this so I was hoping to find another example of it, but as of yet, I had not. If you see one from earlier today or tomorrow, please pass it on and we will be happy to help with this.



Time: Wed April 1, 2020 1:33 PM CFBB v1.2.0 16 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003